“Compliance with this assessment list is not evidence of legal compliance, nor is it intended as guidance to ensure compliance with applicable law. Given the application-specificity of AI systems, the assessment list will need to be tailored to the specific use case and context in which the system operates. In addition, this chapter offers a general recommendation on how to implement the assessment list for Trustworthy AI though a governance structure embracing both operational and management level.” (High-Level Expert Group on AI, 2019, p. 24)“TRUSTWORTHY AI ASSESSMENT LIST (PILOT VERSION) “Diversity, non-discrimination and fairness “Accessibility and universal design: - Did you ensure that the AI system accommodates a wide range of individual preferences and abilities? - Did you assess whether the AI system usable by those with special needs or disabilities or those at risk of exclusion? How was this designed into the system and how is it verified? - Did you ensure that information about the AI system is accessible also to users of assistive technologies? - Did you involve or consult this community during the development phase of the AI system? - Did you take the impact of your AI system on the potential user audience into account? - Did you assess whether the team involved in building the AI system is representative of your target user audience? Is it representative of the wider population, considering also of other groups who might tangentially be impacted? - Did you assess whether there could be persons or groups who might be disproportionately affected by negative implications? - Did you get feedback from other teams or groups that represent different backgrounds and experiences?” (High-Level Expert Group on AI, 2019, p. 30)