Respect for Persons and Human Dignity
A central tenet of ethics is respect for the intrinsic value of persons, or human dignity The human right to be valued and treated with respect because of one's personhood. in all interactions. Respect comprises:
Including:
- Regard for their welfare
- Consideration of the views, norms, and cultural context of individuals involved in research and the communities from which they are recruited (and not recruited)
- Respect for privacy and confidentiality of participants and their communities
- Consideration of the capacity of humans to make their own decisions, and empowering those who may have diminished capacity to make such decisions, with particular care towards these vulnerable populations
Autonomy is normally taken to comprise:
- informed consent - that participants may choose to freely participate or not, based on an understanding of that participation
- agency - that people have the opportunity to participate in research, that their views are heard, respected, and fairly represented, both individually and with respect to cultural norms and values.
Autonomy is about having freedom from external control, being able to according to one's own values; it is fundamental to informed consent. Agency is about one's capacity to be heard and play an active role, recognising participants as active contributors to research.
In the context of emerging technologies, these ethical concerns involve...
here to review
check this, these are now drawn from the same table as the concepts in the introduction and so the thread should be clear.
How is AI research different?
There is potential for breakdown in trust to arise from a loss of exposure to diverse human-human interactions
It is not always clear how we can protect our identities to assure privacy and identity verification
Defining desired outcomes - including general wellbeing - requires stakeholder involvement
How do we ensure protection of data during humanitarian emergencies?
How do we provide consistent oversight of AI to ensure they are accountable to end-users for any conclusions?
It is not always clear how our data is being used, or how we could find out
Implementation fairness and bias in system use, where undue dis/trust is placed in automated systems including in ways that are inequitable, or/and that deskill professionals
There may be lack of accountability for centering stakeholder experience and agency in the design of AI driven by commercial interests
Technologies mediate the interactions and distance between researchers and participants
Non-research platforms such as smart toys may collect data about children with little regulation
Management may experience reduced autonomy, through automisation that limits creative, affective, empathetic concerns
Generic T&C statements provide limited control to individuals over their own data
Norms, aims, and practices are diverse and may vary by location, change over time, and come into conflict
How might AI deployed in care settings to foster intimate relationships impact on relationships among humans?
Access to increasing amounts of data about each other may impact our interactions in ways that change human autonomy
Implementation of AI may be driven by commercial, not values-based, aims
Agency may be stymied in the context of black box models
Respect for human-human relationships, at individual and collective levels
Longstanding concern regarding 'deception' should be applied to the context of affective AI systems
And for education
here to review
check this, these are now drawn from the same table as the concepts in the introduction and so the thread should be clear
How is education research different?
Defining desired outcomes - including general wellbeing - requires stakeholder involvement
Research involving learning may seek to draw on secondary analysis of learner data
There may be lack of accountability for centering stakeholder experience and agency in the design of AI driven by commercial interests
Non-research platforms such as smart toys may collect data about children with little regulation
Research involving teacher-student relationships involves power dynamics
Reification, ossification, and standardisation reduce autonomy
Generic T&C statements provide limited control to individuals over their own data
Agency may be stymied in the context of black box models
Data collection or/and analysis often involves methods that challenge individually based participation models
Technical procedural ethics addressing respect for persons
to add here
tbc. May link to the principles drawn on from the principlemapping table
This section draws on principles discussed in
EC guidelines on AI in education for educators
AI education-research ethics-guideline not-research-ethics
Khan-review systematic literature analysis
Schiff-review AI Ethics Global Document Collection
Jobin-review global landscape of AI ethics guidelines
National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research
ethics-guideline research-ethics
Turing responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector
AI ethics-guideline not-research-ethics
High-level Expert Group on AI
AI ethics-guideline not-research-ethics
IEEE
AI ethics-guideline research-ethics
Fjeld-review mapping consensus in AI ethics
This section draws on
EC guidelines on AI in education for educators
AI education-research ethics-guideline not-research-ethics
Ethics in The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
education-research ethics-guideline research-ethics
National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research
ethics-guideline research-ethics
Turing responsible design and implementation of AI systems in the public sector
AI ethics-guideline not-research-ethics
IEEE
Particular Strategies
These are strategies that relate to respect for persons.
Overview of considerations in transparency
Questions to consider in key stages of AI and machine learning based research, regarding legitmacy and power in consent
project-design reflection-questions
Principle of Accountability, key considerations
Educate the learners in formal education, the public, professionals, and policy makers for designing, and working alongside, AI to advance the SDGs.
Guiding questions for educators regarding Diversity, non-Discrimination, and Fairness of AI in Education
Questions to consider in key stages of AI and machine learning based research, regarding sociotechnical context
project-inception reflection-questions
How do we navigate individual choice of technology engagement and school or system-wide procurement?
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Access to data
Questions to consider in key stages of AI and machine learning based research, regarding transparency and explainability
governance-question project-dissemination reflection-questions
Systematic analysis of consequences, transparency, user agency, and safeguards are central to implementation of AI nudges
Principle of Discriminatory non-harm for fairness, key considerations for implementation fairness
Questions to consider in key stages of AI and machine learning based research, regarding data collection
project-design reflection-questions
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Communication
Key discussion points for planning SoTL research regarding power relationships
education-research reflection-questions
AI assistants should be created to help users understand and manage how their data is being used
Consider tensions and absolute rights
Key discussion points for planning SoTL research regarding secondary analysis of data
education-research reflection-questions
Questions to consider regarding re-identification and issues of justice in IP
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Minimising and reporting negative impacts
Consider developing strategies for specific context of humanitarian action
Questions to consider regarding access to a context (and data) and the perceptions and autonomy of those related to that context regarding access to it
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Human oversight
Principle of Discriminatory non-harm for fairness, key considerations for outcome fairness
Guiding questions for educators regarding Privacy and Data Governance of AI in Education
Questions to consider regarding protection of vulnerable populations
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Stakeholder participation
Guiding questions for educators regarding Accountability of AI in Education
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Unfair bias avoidance
Foundational issue: Promotion of Transparency
Always Center Educators in Instructional Loops
Questions to consider in assessing risk of harms
Wellbeing measures and promotion should be part of AI evaluation
Questions to consider regarding autonomy and informed consent
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Documenting trade-offs
Community norms should be identified, and expertise from intercultural information ethics practitioners embedded in ethics committees
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Traceability
Guiding questions for educators regarding Human Agency and Oversight of AI in Education
Questions to consider regarding the norms and values of those involved in the study and alignment of these to the research
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Society and democracy
Training in skills for adaptability to rapid technological changes informed by improved data regarding labour pattern shifts
Questions to consider regarding data management and participant re-identification
Principle of transparency, key considerations
Principle of Discriminatory non-harm for fairness, key considerations for design fairness
Guiding questions for educators regarding Transparency of AI in Education
Questions to consider in SoTL research inception
education-research reflection-questions
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Quality and integrity of data
Educational data should be classified as sensitive and held in 'escrow' not available for commercial purposes
Principle of Discriminatory non-harm for fairness, key considerations for data fairness
Questions to consider in key stages of AI and machine learning based research, regarding the Research Analytical Process
project-analysis reflection-questions
Questions to consider regarding how a context is defined and conceptualised with respect to relevant stakeholder agency
Questions to consider regarding the nature of the data (as (dis)aggregated, private/public, reidentifiable, etc.)
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Accessibility and universal design
Consider where AI-mediation is, and is not, appropriate with respect to human relationships and autonomy
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - human agency
Tools for individuals to create custom machine-readable dynamic terms and conditions that respect their preferences for data collection and use
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Respect for privacy and data protection
Considerations in assessing trustworthy AI - Auditability
Questions to consider regarding re-identification and disciplinary methodological norms
Particular Cases
Using chatbots to guide learners and parents through administrative tasks
Resource-management-and-administration
Providing individualised interventions for special needs
Dropout-risk-and-grade-prediction
Managing student enrolment and resource planning
Resource-management-and-administration
Teacher evaluation fails to acknowledge individual contexts and teacher autonomy
Using adaptive learning technologies to adapt to each learner’s ability
Adaptive-and-personalised-learning