# "Recommendations1.It is important that human workers’ interaction with other workers not always be intermediated by affective systems (or other technology) which may filter out autonomy, innovation, and communication.2.Human points of contact should remain available to customers and other organizations when using A/IS.3.Affective systems should be designed to support human autonomy, sense of competence, and meaningful relationships as these are necessary to support a flourishing life.4.Even where A/IS are less expensive, more predictable, and easier to control than human employees, a core network of human employees should be maintained at every level of decision-making in order to ensure preservation of human autonomy, communication, and innovation.5.Management and organizational theorists should consider appropriate use of affective and autonomous systems to enhance their business models and the efficacy of their workforce within the limits of the preservation of human autonomy.

## Further reading

• J. J. Bryson, “Artificial Intelligence and Pro-Social Behavior,” in _Collective Agency and Cooperation in Natural and Artificial Systems, _C. Misselhorn, Ed., pp. 281–306, Springer,
  

• D. Peters, R.A. Calvo, and R.M. Ryan,“[Designing for Motivation, Engagement and ](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/
  

• 3389/fpsyg.
  

• 00797/full)[Wellbeing in Digital Experience](https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/
  

• 3389/fpsyg.
  

• 00797/full),”_ Frontiers in Psychology_– Human Media Interaction, vol. 9, pp 797,
  

• ""p.100-101